Legislative Committee Releases MH/MR Salary Study

February 6, 1999

The General Assembly's Legislative Budget & Finance Committee (LBFC) today released its report, Salary Levels and Their Impact on Quality of Care for Client Contact Workers in Community-Based MH/MR Programs (see Summary). The report was in response to House Resolution 450 (prime sponsor: David Levdansky, D-Allegheny), which called on LBFC to update a similar study that was undertaken in 1989.

The study will be distributed to relevant legislative committees (such as the House Health & Human Services Committee and the Senate Public Health & Welfare Committee), individual representatives and senators, and the public. LBFC studies are generally meant to be fact-finding reports, not to provide recommendations, although we are pleased that this study contains 10 pages of recommendations that providers proposed in response to LBFC's salary survey.

PCPA considers the LBFC report an excellent representation of the problems and challenges facing the community MH/MR system as it looks toward additional downsizing of state institutions, increased reliance on community-based agencies, and the spread of managed care. It is now up to providers, advocates, and public officials to use the report's information to forge improved public policy and adequate, flexible funding for programs.

PCPA members are urged to contact their local legislators to obtain a copy of the study, and to use this as an opportunity to discuss with public officials the financial issues facing providers.

Please contact Lu Conser at the Association if you have any questions of comments.

 

Legislative Budget & Finance Committe

Report on Salary Levels and Their Impact on Quality of Care
for Client Contact Workers in Community-Based MH/MR Program
s

House Resolution 450 calls on the LB&FC to update its 1989 study on salaries paid to client contact workers in community-based mental health and mental retardation programs and the impact such salaries have on quality of care. Questionnaires were sent to all licensed private MH/MR community-based provider organizations (except early intervention and inpatient hospitalization programs), with a 45% return rate. Information was collected on a total of 25,925 client contact workers, including 19,759 direct care workers.

Findings:

MH/MR provider suggestions made to improve the compensation package for direct care workers include:

Target funds to increase direct care worker salaries. The report discusses legislation passed in Michigan to provide salary increases to community-based MH/MR workers. Educational reimbursement or forgiveness. Such programs exist for childcare professionals and for teachers who work in urban and rural public schools. Ensure that COLAs and any savings resulting from de-institutionalization are passed on to community providers. Expand the MA Home and Community-Based Waiver. This would increase federal funds to community-based programs, which could then be used to fund salary increases. Relax regulations and categorical funding requirements. Several providers believe this would allow them to spend funds more efficiently, thus freeing up money to fund salary increases.

 

back