Richard Edley • April 3, 2026

PA Commonwealth Court Invalidates DHS CHC Procurement

Author

Richard Edley

Date

April 3, 2026

Share

THIS IS PORTAL AUTHENTICATOR WIDGET. THIS WON'T BE VISIBLE ON PUBLISHED PAGE.

The following information is courtesy of the Wojdak Government Relations Team. Please be aware that this is simply a summary and is not a legal opinion. For additional information or legal analysis, please contact a lawyer.

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued two coordinated decisions that invalidate the Department of Human Services’ Community HealthChoices (CHC) procurement (RFA 31-22).



What the Court Decided

The Court found that DHS failed to demonstrate that it conducted required zone-specific evaluations for each of the five CHC regions, despite the RFA explicitly requiring that approach. All applicants received identical scores across all zones — an outcome the Court described as statistically implausible and inconsistent with prior procurements.


Because DHS did not follow the RFA’s mandatory evaluation structure and failed to provide a rational explanation for the scoring results, the Court held that the procurement was arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law. As such, the Court reversed DHS’s determinations and cancelled the CHC award in its entirety.


Operational Implications

  1. DHS cannot move forward with negotiations or implementation under the cancelled award.
  2. Current CHC contracts are expected to remain in place pending DHS next steps.
  3. DHS must now choose whether to re-issue a corrected RFA, re-evaluate submissions (unlikely given the Court’s findings), or appeal.
  4. Plans should expect a period of operational status quo while DHS evaluates its path forward.
  5. The decision may influence how DHS structures future procurements, particularly around. evaluation transparency


Potential Legal Next Steps

If DHS appeals:

  1. DHS may petition the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for allowance of appeal.
  2. DHS may seek a stay of the Commonwealth Court’s order.
  3. If a stay is granted, DHS could resume work with selected plans during the appeal.
  4. If no stay is granted, the procurement remains cancelled during the appellate process.


If DHS does not appeal:

  1. DHS will need to restart the procurement — likely through a revised RFA or new competitive process.
  2. A new procurement timeline would likely extend many months.

< Previous Post

Next Post >
PA ODP logo with dark blue border

ODP Updates the MAAC on Paid Relative Caregiving & Travel Limitations

By Tim Sohosky • May 29, 2026
On Thursday, May 28, the Office of Developmental Programs (ODP) provided an update to the Medical Assistance Advisory Committee (MAAC) regarding current policies and upcoming regulatory changes following a recent Commonwealth Court decision. On February 17, 2026, the PA Commonwealth Court issued a decision in Dunkelberger v. Department of Human Services that determined that ODP’s limitations on provider model services (specifically the 40/60-hour caps and 90-day travel maximums) were null and void. The decision was based on process rather than policy validity; the Court found that these limitations were not properly promulgated as regulations in accordance with the Commonwealth Documents Law and Regulatory Review Act. To maintain a balanced approach between flexibility and oversight, ODP is moving forward with the following actions: Regulatory Amendments: ODP will amend regulations to establish formal authority for setting service delivery limits that support individual welfare and program integrity. Self-Directed Model Agreements: ODP has already modified agreements for self-directed models to clarify limits on overtime, combined relative service provision, and travel restrictions. Travel Restrictions: Due to the inability to monitor services effectively over long distances, service provision will now be limited to Pennsylvania and contiguous states. Waiver Changes: ODP will seek modifications through the amendment process to the Consolidated, P/FDS, Community Living, and Adult Autism Waivers to include: New requirements for agencies providing IHCS and Companion services to disclose a DSP's relationship to participants; and Strengthened programmatic oversight and integrity measures. Life Sharing Alternative: For participants requiring more than 60 hours of paid care from a relative, the Life Sharing (24/7) service model remains the recommended alternative. ODP anticipates a public comment period for these proposed waiver changes beginning in January 2027.
Two men with intellectual disabilities working happily on a tablet.

Shapiro Administration's Strategic Investments in ID/A Community Lead to Highest Number of Pennsylvanians Ever Served in HCBS

By Tim Sohosky • May 28, 2026
Press Release from DHS : Published May 27, 2026
Yellow screen with the words

ODP Provides Updates to PBC 2026/27 Residential Pay-for-Performance

By Cathy Barrick • May 28, 2026
The Office of Developmental Programs (ODP) has shared ODPANN 26-039 . The purpose of this communication is to provide updated details about the Residential Performance-Based Contracting (PBC) Pay-for-Performance (P4P) initiatives for Fiscal Year 2026/27. Updates are provided in red . Please review the announcement for more details. Visit here to access the Pay for Performance (P4P): Residential Rural Capacity Expansion Plan template .